← Writing
Reframe · 2026

Intellispace
by Reframe

When AI makes information abundant, coherence is the competitive edge. Intellispace makes organisational conflict legible — and routes it toward resolution.

Decided Needs resolution Structural signal
Core belief

Conflict is not failure. It is signal.

Most organisations do not fail because their people are insufficiently productive. They fail because the people inside them cannot say what they believe in the presence of the people who need to hear it.

The problem is not that conflict exists. The problem is that organisations have no infrastructure to make it legible. Intellispace is that infrastructure.

01
Power dynamics
Whose framing becomes the agreed framing, regardless of correctness
02
Uncertainty
Commitment forced before sufficient information exists
03
Changing assumptions
Monday's reasoning is wrong by Thursday — decisions persist
04
Emotional tension
People say what the room wants to hear, not what they think
05
Incomplete information
Someone always knows something relevant that did not surface
How it works

From conversation to coherence

A PM pastes a meeting transcript. The system extracts signals, routes them to the right people, and closes the loop — all without another meeting.

PASTE Meeting transcript AI EXTRACTION Signal classification PM REVIEWS Decision queue Decided Unresolved Structural PATHWAY 1 Decision trace PATHWAY 2 Threshold negotiation PATHWAY 3 HR escalation ASYNC Team responds HR Documents action LOOP CLOSES Resolution confirmed ORGANISATIONAL MEMORY Decision traces · patterns · velocity · clarity
Five user roles

Each person sees what they need

Visibility is strictly scoped. HR never sees individual data. Team members see only what affects their work. Every role has one screen and one clear question.

PM
Decision queue, conflict cards to route
Tier 1
Team member
One conflict card at a time, async
Own work only
CPO
Decision trails across squads
Tiers 1+2
HR
Structural patterns, no individual data
Tiers 2+3
Leadership
Outcome alignment, strategic coherence
Tier 3
Resolution pathways

Every signal routed to the right resolution

Conflict type determines pathway. Mode classification determines intervention. Grounded in Kilmann's five conflict modes — 50 years of organisational research.

PATHWAY 1
Decision trace
For DECIDED items. PM confirms reasoning and tradeoff. Team verifies understanding. Stored with confidence 1–3. Addresses avoiding and accommodating modes.
PATHWAY 2
Threshold negotiation
For UNRESOLVED tensions. Both sides name minimum needs. AI suggests a threshold. Team responds asynchronously. Maximum two rounds before PM call.
PATHWAY 3
Structural escalation
For STRUCTURAL signals. Routes to HR with pattern data and three resolution paths. HR sees patterns — never individuals. Addresses root causes.
North star promise

Two numbers no PM has ever seen

At the end of 30 days, a PM knows their decision velocity and clarity — the numbers that tell them how coherent their team's decision-making actually is.

30
days to your first decision velocity and clarity report
Decision velocity
How fast the team moves from conversation to committed decision per sprint
decisions_conf_2plus / sprint_days × 10
Decision clarity
What percentage of decisions were understood and acted on correctly
correct_executions / total_decisions × 100
Product roadmap

Seven phases · starting now

Phase 1 — Core mechanic
Extraction · pathways · five roles · memory
Complete
Phase 2 — Signal quality
Confidence · velocity · clarity · 30-day report
Active
Phase 3 — Async resolution
Response persistence · auto-resolve · loop closure
Days 30–60
Phase 4 — Signal sources
Meeting tools · Slack · Jira · file upload
Days 60–90
Phase 5 — Intelligence layer
Pattern detection · drift · culture health
Days 90–120
Phase 6 — Agentic architecture
Watcher · pattern · routing · memory agents
Days 120–180
Phase 7 — Scale layer
Multi-squad · benchmarking · API · enterprise
Day 180+